Date: 2026-02-14 Context: Strategic decisions before building Extension Teams Status: Discussion document — needs decisions
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Individual | $10/mo | 1 team of your choice |
| Team (3+ seats) | $7/seat/mo | 1 team of your choice |
| Additional team | +$5/mo (individual) / +$5/seat/mo (team) | Per team unlock |
A user signs up and picks their primary team (most will pick Product). To access Finance agents, they add the Finance team for $5/mo more.
Individual examples:
Pros:
| Tier | Individual | Team (per seat) |
|---|---|---|
| Single Team | $10/mo | $7/mo |
| Each Additional | +$5/mo | +$5/seat/mo |
| Full Organization (all teams) | $25/mo | $20/seat/mo |
The "Full Organization" price should be attractive enough that users with 4+ teams would choose it over à la carte. At 4 teams à la carte = $25 (individual) or $22/seat (team), so $25/$20 creates a natural breakpoint.
This depends on how we define the team roster. If we align to a corporate hierarchy:
| Team | Core Functions |
|---|---|
| Product | Product Management, Product Marketing, UX |
| Finance | FP&A, Revenue, IR, Controller, Treasury |
| Legal | Contracts, Privacy, IP, Compliance, Employment |
| Design | UI, Visual, Interaction, User Research, Motion |
| Architecture | API, Data, Security, Cloud, AI |
| Marketing | Content, SEO, CRO, Paid, Email, Social, Growth, PR |
| Operations | PMO, Procurement, Process, Risk, Quality |
| Corporate Development | M&A, Strategic Partnerships, Corporate Venture |
Plus coaches are embedded per-team (not a separate purchasable team).
The Executive layer (CEO, CFO, CTO, CMO, etc.) could be:
The Product OS has a 4-tier hierarchy that no other team matches:
Product OS (4 tiers):
👑 CPO (C-level)
└── 📈 VP Product (VP)
├── 📋 Dir PM (Director)
├── 📣 Dir PMM (Director)
└── ICs: PM, PMM, BizOps, BizDev, CI, ProdOps, UX, VR, MentorExtension Teams (2 tiers):
🎨 Dir Design → 5 specialists
🏗️ Chief Architect → 5 specialists
📢 Dir Marketing → 13 specialists
My Finance/Legal Plan (2 tiers):
💼 Dir Finance → 6 specialists + coach
⚖️ General Counsel → 6 specialists + coach
In an AI agent team, hierarchy serves three purposes:
Every team follows: C-Level → Director → Specialists
C-Level (opus) — Strategic, portfolio-level, cross-functional
Director (opus) — Operational leadership, team routing, synthesis
Specialists (sonnet) — Domain-specific task execution
Product Team:
👑 CPO → 📈 VP Product → Dir PM, Dir PMM → ICs
Finance Team:
💰 CFO → 💼 Dir Finance → FP&A, Revenue, IR, Controller, Treasury
Legal Team:
⚖️ General Counsel → 📜 Dir Legal → Contracts, Privacy, IP, Compliance, Employment
Design Team:
🎨 Chief Design Officer → 🖼️ Dir Design → UI, Visual, Interaction, Research, Motion
Architecture Team:
🏗️ CTO → 🔧 Dir Engineering → API, Data, Security, Cloud, AI
Marketing Team:
📢 CMO → 📣 Dir Marketing → 13 specialists
Pros: Clean, consistent, scalable. Each team has strategic + operational + execution layers. Cons: Adds ~6 new agents (one C-level or Director per team). More agents to build.
Only Product gets the full hierarchy (CPO/VP/Dir/IC) because it's the flagship. All other teams keep: Lead → Specialists
The "Lead" adapts per domain (GC for Legal, Chief Architect for Architecture, etc.)
Pros: Fewer agents, simpler, faster to build. Cons: Inconsistent. Users might expect a CFO agent if they see a CPO. No strategic layer for non-Product functions.
Create a cross-functional Executive Team that includes all C-level agents, plus CEO:
Executive Team (@executive):
🏢 CEO → Company strategy, cross-functional alignment, board prep
├── 👑 CPO (already exists in Product OS)
├── 💰 CFO → Financial strategy, budget governance
├── ⚖️ CLO/GC → Legal strategy, risk governance
├── 🏗️ CTO → Technology strategy
├── 📢 CMO → Marketing strategy
└── 🎨 CDO → Design strategy
Each C-level agent interfaces with their team's Director:
Should we have a CEO agent?
A CEO agent would handle:
Argument AGAINST: Most Legionis users won't be actual CEOs. A CPO or VP Product is a more natural primary user. CEO might feel presumptuous.
My recommendation: Yes, include CEO — but position as the "Strategic Advisor" that synthesizes across all functions. Available in "Full Organization" tier only.
EXECUTIVE TEAM (@executive) — Available in Full Organization tier
🏢 CEO
├── 👑 CPO (exists — Product OS)
├── 💰 CFO (new)
├── ⚖️ General Counsel / CLO (new — currently GC in Legal team)
├── 🏗️ CTO (new — rename from Chief Architect)
├── 📢 CMO (new)
└── 🎨 CDO (new)PRODUCT TEAM (@product) — Flagship, deepest hierarchy
👑 CPO (shared with Executive)
└── 📈 VP Product
├── 📋 Dir PM
├── 📣 Dir PMM
└── ICs: PM, PMM, BizOps, BizDev, CI, ProdOps, UX, VR
FINANCE TEAM (@finance)
💰 CFO (shared with Executive)
└── 💼 Dir Finance
└── FP&A, Revenue, IR, Controller, Treasury
LEGAL TEAM (@legal)
⚖️ General Counsel (shared with Executive)
└── Dir Legal Affairs
└── Contracts, Privacy, IP, Compliance, Employment
DESIGN TEAM (@design)
🎨 CDO (shared with Executive)
└── Dir Design (existing, retitled)
└── UI, Visual, Interaction, Research, Motion
ARCHITECTURE TEAM (@architecture)
🏗️ CTO (shared with Executive)
└── Chief Architect (existing, now operational lead)
└── API, Data, Security, Cloud, AI
MARKETING TEAM (@marketing)
📢 CMO (shared with Executive)
└── Dir Marketing (existing)
└── 13 specialists
COACHING LAYER — Embedded per team (not separate)
Each team gets a Coach agent (opus)
Key design decisions:
| Function | Where | Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Product OS | 13 agents |
| Design | Extension Team | 6 agents |
| Architecture / Engineering Planning | Extension Team | 6 agents |
| Marketing | Extension Team | 14 agents |
| Finance (planned) | Extension Team | 7 agents |
| Legal (planned) | Extension Team | 7 agents |
The operational backbone of any company. Planning-only scope:
| Agent | Key | Domain | Planning Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dir Operations | @ops-dir | Operational leadership, process governance | Process strategy, operational excellence |
| Program Manager | @program-manager | Program management, cross-functional coordination | Program planning, dependency mapping, milestone tracking |
| Project Manager | @project-manager | Project planning, resource allocation | WBS, Gantt planning, risk registers, status frameworks |
| Procurement Specialist | @procurement | Vendor evaluation, purchasing strategy | Vendor selection frameworks, RFP creation, contract evaluation |
| Process Engineer | @process-engineer | Business process optimization | Process mapping (BPMN), bottleneck analysis, automation strategy |
| Risk Manager | @risk-manager | Enterprise risk management | Risk registers, mitigation planning, business continuity |
Knowledge Packs: Project Management (PMBoK, Agile Portfolio), Process Optimization (Lean, Six Sigma, BPMN), Procurement (RFP/RFQ, vendor evaluation), Enterprise Risk (COSO ERM, ISO 31000)
Overlap with existing:
@prod-ops (Product Ops) handles product-specific operations. This Operations team handles company-wide operations.@project-manager vs @prod-ops: ProdOps is product process optimization. PM is cross-functional project planning.Strategic growth beyond organic product development:
| Agent | Key | Domain | Planning Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head of Corp Dev | @corpdev-dir | Strategic development leadership | M&A strategy, partnership strategy, investment thesis |
| M&A Analyst | @ma-analyst | M&A analysis, due diligence | Target identification, valuation, synergy analysis, integration planning |
| Strategic Partnerships | @strategic-partnerships | Partnership strategy, ecosystem | Partnership frameworks, deal structures, JV planning |
| Corporate Venture | @corp-venture | Venture investments, innovation scouting | Investment thesis, startup evaluation, portfolio management |
Knowledge Packs: M&A Frameworks (valuation, due diligence, integration), Partnership Models (JVs, strategic alliances, licensing), Venture/Innovation (CVC, startup evaluation, portfolio theory)
Overlap with existing:
@bizdev (Business Development) handles partnerships and market expansion from a product perspective. Corp Dev handles company-level strategic transactions.@investor-relations (Finance) handles investor communications. Corp Dev handles the strategic M&A/investment decisions.Planning and governance of enterprise technology (distinct from Architecture which focuses on product architecture):
| Agent | Key | Domain | Planning Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIO / IT Dir | @it-dir | IT strategy, technology governance | IT roadmap, digital transformation, technology standards |
| IT Security Policy | @it-security | IT security policies, cyber governance | Security policies, awareness programs, incident response planning |
| Enterprise Systems | @enterprise-systems | Enterprise tooling, SaaS management | Tool evaluation, integration strategy, vendor management |
| Data Governance | @data-governance | Data strategy, governance, quality | Data classification, retention policies, data quality frameworks |
Knowledge Packs: IT Governance (COBIT, ITIL), Cybersecurity Frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls), Data Governance (DAMA-DMBOK, data mesh), Digital Transformation
Overlap with existing:
@security-architect designs product security. @it-security creates security policies and governance.@compliance-officer (Legal) handles regulatory compliance. @it-dir handles IT-specific compliance (SOC2 controls implementation).@data-governance could live in IT or Legal — it bridges both.| Team | Business Impact | MVP Priority | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance | High | P0 — Build now | Every company needs financial planning |
| Legal | High | P0 — Build now | Every company needs legal guidance |
| Operations | Medium-High | P1 — Next wave | Project/program management is universal |
| Corporate Development | Medium | P2 — Later | Only relevant for growth-stage companies |
| IT Governance | Medium | P2 — Later | Overlaps heavily with Architecture + Legal |
| Executive | High | P1 — Next wave | CEO + C-suite for "Full Organization" |
| # | Team | Gateway | Lead | Agents | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Product | @product | CPO | 13 | ✅ Done |
| 2 | Design | @design | CDO/Dir Design | 6-7 | ✅ Done |
| 3 | Architecture | @architecture | CTO/Chief Architect | 6-7 | ✅ Done |
| 4 | Marketing | @marketing | CMO/Dir Marketing | 14-15 | ✅ Done |
| 5 | Finance | @finance | CFO | 7-8 | 🔨 P0 |
| 6 | Legal | @legal | GC/CLO | 7-8 | 🔨 P0 |
| 7 | Operations | @operations | COO/Ops Dir | 6-7 | 📋 P1 |
| 8 | Executive | @executive | CEO | 6-7 | 📋 P1 |
| 9 | Corp Dev | @corpdev | Head of Corp Dev | 4-5 | 📌 P2 |
| 10 | IT | @it | CIO | 4-5 | 📌 P2 |
Full vision totals:
At full build-out, Legionis offers:
"Your complete AI-powered organization: 80+ specialized agents across 10 teams covering every planning function — from strategy to finance to legal to operations. Start with one team, grow to a full organization."
Created: 2026-02-14